![]() |
|
| Home | MR2OC Store | Parts Vendors | Free Image Hosting | Premium Membership | 2 of the Month | About the MR2OC | MR2 Racing | Reference Links | MR2 Links |
|
Welcome,
Trance4c. You last visited: March 24th, 2006 at 15:51 | ||||||
| User CP | Trader Ratings | Rules & FAQ | Members List | MR2 Racing Records | Calendar | New Posts | Search | Quick Links | Log Out |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (2 members and 0 guests) | |
| Trance4c, lagos |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 6th, 2005, 00:22 |
#1 |
|
187 SW20
|
My Cheap Intake Manifold *Gamble*
So Dave (a Celica owner) comes to the shop one day so Ricky can dyno
his car. I was checking out his intake manifold (caldina motor) and told him I wanted
something like that. He told me he used a 3SGE Intake manifold on his old Gen2 head. The 3SGE manifold came
from a 87-89 2.0L Celica GTS. He said he bought it dirt cheap, and it was
a good upgrade for Celicas. Some Celica owners do this mod to make simpler
intercooler piping, and also Side-feed manifold. These manifolds go for about $25-$100. I
managed to buy one from a salavge yard in SoCal for $100 (TPS, TB, EGR,
TFFR). Heres the manifold out of the box: You can identify which manifold it is by the huge TVIS on the top. Heres the Comparison between the 3SGE/3SGTE. Both thottlebodies,runners,flange everything is the same size As you can see, the 3SGE Plentum is larger. everything else is the same! Im going to bench test the manifold after i get it cleaned up a bit. Bolted up to a 3SGTE Head. lots of clearnece. The Celica GTS uses a TFFR (which I have and can mate to my setup) It is quite large and I should beable to run 850's. It will require a custom bracket to bolt on but hey.. thats easy. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 00:23 |
#2 |
|
187 SW20
|
Exhaust Manifold
Comparisons: SSAutoChrome, SFP,Stock w/ATS Adapter Pics of it installed: This is the SFP Manifold with my GT3037R. As you can see there are some fitment issues. Another thing I noticed was the Wastegate flange is clocked wrong. I would cut it, reweld it and aim the dump tube straight down running between the tranny/block. Stock manifold w/ATS's adapter (Thanks Aaron) Better Fitment. can mount wastegate top or bottom. I also weighed all the manifolds, and turbo. Ill post the #'s tomorrow. I will post more pics as the project progresses. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 00:47 |
#3 |
|
shred the gnar!
|
good find on the intake manifold. i just cut my stock one and custom made a
plenum with a side feed inlet, but my TB is on the other side (next to the
cruise control which i no longer have). i always liked the SFP manifolds,
but so save money i'm going to be using an adapter like that for my sc61
turbo after i get my car running. nice turbo, by the way... |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 00:51 |
#6 |
|
187 SW20
|
It's just you. I measured each one with a caliper gauge. Their
exactly the same. SPF Manifold needs some work, what can you expect for 400 bux. (im actually probably going to be using the stock manifold). I havent fit the SSAutochrome manifold on yet.... I will do that tomorrow. It will be the Manifold+ATS's Adaptor.+GT3037R. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:16 |
#8 | |
|
shred the gnar!
|
Quote:
yes. the ATS adapter bolts to the stock turbo manifold and any turbo with a T3 turbine housing (aka t3/t4). like this: stock manifold > ATS adapter > t3/t4 turbo (sorry my diagram sux) | |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:21 |
#10 |
|
187 SW20
|
it's a T3 adapter.. so yeah.. what Flyin' said. Any turbo with a T3 flange will bolt up, but not necessarly *Clear* the heatshield/tranny. I had to remove the little heatshield for the clutch slave line to make my turbo fit. *edit* No ATS does not sell the adaptor alone. Aaron allowed me to purchase one for R&D. Also this one is the "Celica" adapter design. It is not used in the newer TD05/TD06 kits they sell. They have a better design for that application. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:22 |
#11 |
|
Registered User
|
1. Will you be performing an engine dyno comparison between the two
intake manifolds? 2. Will you be able to perform an a/f ratio comparison between both as well so as to see if the side-feed will even out individual cylinder ratios? In theory, it should, but theories are useless until proven. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:24 |
#12 | ||
|
187 SW20
|
Quote:
If my Hoover lets me, yes.. I have a Load Control Dyno in the shop. Also it depends if Ricky's up to doing it also. Quote:
Same as above. | ||
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:25 |
#13 |
|
Stroked and Blown...
![]() |
So does the 3SGE intake manny clear a stock fuel rail.. or perhaps a
wolfkatz sidefeed rail? What about the ISC?
I'd need to see some overhead shots but it seems to me, that this intake manny would be PERFECT for the topmount IC that's been in threads lately... talk bout ZERO IC piping.. about 6 inches from the compressor, then another 10 inches to the TB... plus bigger plenum? Sounds like it'd be an AWESOME setup for a 350-400whp goal (IC being the limitting factor?). __________________ Boostd4 |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:28 |
#14 |
|
187 SW20
|
it should clear stock fuel rail. I didnt take off my Wolfkatz fuel
rail yet so I will find out tomorrow. It will clear.. for sure i know it.
I can also use the 3SGE Celica GTS TFFR also.
This will give me a larger selection of injector sizes. My stock fuel rail
is at home so I wont have that until next Monday. I can test fit it.
I recently sold my Top mount setup =*( But I made it so I know where it sits, I can mock it up really quick.. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:45 |
#15 |
|
Stroked and Blown...
![]() |
I'm thinking this IC setup: http://mr2oc.com/showpost.php?p=1130806&postcount=8
, and that sidemount manifold would make an
awesome pair. And there are nearly identical A2W setups with the IC in the same spot. Would be very convenient to have the TB on that side of the engine. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 01:53 |
#18 |
|
187 SW20
|
Oh, another difference in the throttle bodies is the mounting points.
Longer cable is most likely going to be required. I can use a cable off of
a NA MR2 w/out cruise control (it's longer). |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 02:30 |
#19 |
|
Mr. Self Destruct
![]() |
wow, that will reduce the piping over half a foot+
__________________ ![]() IndyHP 93turbo Winged Warrior II - Performance Challenge and Car Show - June 3rd, Indy |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 02:32 |
#20 | |
|
187 SW20
|
Quote:
actually, try 3feet. your forgetting Turbo=>IC inlet. My old topmount was 5" from turbo =>IC | |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 02:34 |
#21 |
|
Stroked and Blown...
![]() |
What about idle speed controller? Not a problem if the 3SGTE TB bolts
directly on, but I noticed in the pics that the 3SGTE manny has a keyway
cut at the bottom of the TB hole. I believe this is for the ISC, right?
What would you do about that? |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 02:36 |
#22 |
|
187 SW20
|
i'll post pics of both throttle bodies tomorrw. It has that ISC that
your talking about next to the water lines.. there's 3 big hoses comming
out of the tb. 2 carry coolant, 1 looks like vaccum (ISC your reffering
too?). Both throttle bodies have both. everything hose/line is identical..
just different location.
Last edited by Pred : October 6th, 2005 at 02:38. |
|
|
October 6th, 2005, 02:40 |
#23 |
|
Stroked and Blown...
![]() |
Yea, that would be the ISC. I was thinking you were planning on
bolting the 3SGTE TB to the corolla manny. You're planning on using the
corolla TB? The ISC hole I was referring to is on the manifold itself.. if you look at the large intake hole for the TB on the 3SGTE, there is a rectangular cutout at the bottom of the hole for the ISC to feed air around the the TB to control idle. I can't see that on the corolla manifold. Not an issue if you use a corolla TB, I guess.. just figuring out how to make it the most economically feasible. So these mannies come from 87-89 *USDM* Celica GTS's? |
|
|